Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), pre-arrest bail from Section 376 rape, the accused's memory was designated with a special role in the FIR that he entered the complainant's home and thereafter Adultery Bill Jaber committed the crime with the complainant's daughter (the victim). His threats if he cried and cried out in his statement before the magistrate repeated the contents of the FIR and fully involved the suspect that he had taken advantage of isolation and forced adultery. Was alleged to have charged with her. The parties were sued for pressuring him and his family to compromise on a civil war dispute, which was untrustworthy because no one could stake his or her own honor. His family has been accused of petty things that don't matter. In the FIR, the aforementioned eyewitness testimony was overturned because in such cases, the lone statement of the victim was sufficient for the accused person's conviction, allowing Sidd to be remanded in custody pending a pre-arrest warrant. \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013