Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD ARSLAN versus CHANCELLOR, QUAID-E-AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS

Section 2A & 4 Limitation Act (X of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Appeal before the service tribunal delay, the applicant's argument was contended that Section 2A of the service tribunals. After the Operation Operation 1973, the question of limitation should have been decided by the Service Tribunal in light of special circumstances as the provisions of Section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 provided for the departmental appeal only to the civil servant and Nor did anyone want a fixed-term job. Under Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, regarding the jurisdiction of the service tribunal, the applicant also claimed that he did not wish to be reinstated in the service but only for a period of four years to expire. The pending appeal leave was approved. The court will consider the applicant's questions criminal advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer