The plaintiff's duty to dissolve the marriage on account of non-payment of section 5 and schedule and 14 restitution allowances was to prove that the defendant's husband had neglected her or that he had failed to provide restitution for two years. But she was unsuccessful by any evidence to prove that the record had proved that the plaintiff / her husband's house had been left in her absence and the defendant had not only her Gifted his golden ornaments on demand, but on his demand built a separate house for him. , But he deliberately refused to return to defendant after voluntarily leaving defendant's home, in which case the defendant was not obliged to retain and the defendant was obliged to prove his case through his evidence. And could not be allowed to take advantage of the weakness. Defendant's evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
