Find a Lawyer

MST. SARWAR JAN versus ABDUR REHMAN

Marriage defamation due to Khulla The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had treated her husband wrongfully and began beating her and abusing her and treating his wife as male and non-violent. Treated humanely. Regarding the inhumane and cruel treatment of her husband, she was severely spiritual and mentally disturbed and she has created a great displeasure against the husband with whom she has been bound by the court of Allah's family in any case. I couldn't survive. It was not proved that the wife claimed that when the family court made it clear that the spouses could not live within the limits of Allah, it was necessary for the family court to marry on the basis of khola. Dissolve it on oppression or other grounds. As she was not accused of maintaining a valid wife, that she could not live with her husband against whom she was born of intense hatred and dislike, Syed herself filed a case for khola. Even if her requests for torture, beatings, etc. were not proved, the wife would like to accept Khola's plea, even in the High Court of Appeal, she said, especially the Family Court. It was not taken before that the termination of marriage on the basis of khula was a pure question of law and it was raised before the court. can go. Such evidence will not require any proof as it is a statement of the plaintiff. Lonely wife who hates, dislikes, hates, is incompatible with mood, mental, intellectual, social, cultural or ideological distinctions how to become a advocate from Issa Khel lawyer