MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD IJAZ
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 324/109/337 F (iii) and (vi) Bail, the trial court's cancellation had left the accused on bail only on the basis that the trial court ruled Didn't finish. Within the period stated by him, the trial revealed that both parties had participated in the dismissal of the bail case under Section 497, only after the CRPC had recorded the matter. There is no reasonable basis for believing that the accused can be cleared by. His involvement in the matter and further investigation was needed. The accused was named in the FIR with a special firing role and under Section 242424 the victim was injured by fireworks, PPC was subjected to a prohibited clause of section 497 (1). ? The CCP order ordering bail to the accused was illegal and without jurisdiction and accordingly it was withdrawn.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Feroz Walla lawyer
