Find a Lawyer

MESSRS S.M. HASSAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 11 (2) Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) General Clause Act (X of 1897) Theft of Freedom Awareness Ordinance (XCVI of 2002) Tax Complainant's Prior Assessment Sales officials informed sales tax and central excise duty tax authorities on the supply of telephone directories and services provided by the Pakistan Telecommunications Company Limited on the basis of accounts audited but sales tax authorities did not respond. Did not provide telephone directories to users. No charges and questions were raised without the imposition of sales tax, the duty received against the tax was printed in the Annual Audit Report by the complainant and the complainant was not the affected party and the duty / seals against the PTCL were short. There was no Lux Standby to complain about the payment. Complaint of tax accuracy, duty against Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited, duty and tax related to theft of years and tax on telephone directories and delivery of services provided, to provide copies of cell tax declarations as per the complainant's decision. The request was not considered and the audit report was reinstated with Pakistan Telecommunications Company Limited or the Central Board of Revenue because there was no error. Reported by complainant, complaint was not maintained and was excluded by Federal Tax Ombudsman law firms from Multan lawyer