MUHAMMAD URIS versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION DOKRI AND 2 OTHERS
The applicant for the registration of section 154, 561 A&439 FIR, whose son was allegedly abducted, went to the police station for registration of an FIR against a person whom the applicant had filed. He had information and information that he had abducted his son, but the police did not record his FIR and instead filed an FIR in which only the suspect of the abduction was named. Without going away, the trial court refused to name the person in the FIR, whom the applicant had knowledge and information about. The applicant had said that the second FIR could be registered in the incident, the High Court did not ban the recording of the second FIR on the same crime, the High Court reviewed. Accepting the request, the police directed the authorities to record the applicant's statement and an FIR could be lodged if there was an identifiable offense.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
