Constitutional application of Arts 185 (3) and 1991, defining their restitution for more than 2/2 years, the constitutional application was dismissed by the High Court on 20 7 1999 for illegal proceedings, and the petitioner filed his An application was filed on 22nd for rehabilitation. In 2002, the plea was extended that due to his lawyer's illness, he dismissed the petition due to the notice being issued to the parties but the applicant was absent and the application was time-barred or applied for a month. Nor was there any specific confusion as to when the applicant learned of the removal of the constitutional petition when the party approached the court outside the boundary, explaining the delay of each day to such party. Will be. Supreme Court denies interference in High Court's order approving appeals
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
