Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM RASUL versus THE STATE


Along with the Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Trial Court, the High Court relied on the evidence of the Sub Inspector Police who conducted the raid and affected the recovery of the drugs. What. The Chemical Examiner's report on the recovered goods was positive; at the trial, the trial court did not find the trial court's evidence to be credible for the non-attachment of private persons by the raiding party. In poor conditions the house of the accused was searched. The trial was not material. In this regard, the defense did not even raise any question about the objection of the investigating officer as the non-production of the case property was decided at trial or before the High Court at any stage. Was not taken forward. Action

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.