Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AZAD KHAN versus THE STATE


Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 353 Law Defining Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 70 and 71 Evidence In a case after recording the statements of witnesses, their copies were prepared and put on record. In the other case, such procedure is a violation of the provisions of the 1984 Trial Court, the evidence under law paragraphs and Art 70 and 71, thus, in another case, the evidence of a case was read under which Was. The law mode adopted by the trial court in conducting the trial was illegal, which adversely affected the trial and consequently the conviction of the accused was set aside and both cases were used for the recording of evidence. Was sent to the trial court for trial from the stage.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Makran lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.