Sections 305 and 320 of the petition to terminate the company petitioned the petitioner to sue the company for some allegations that the company was acquiring the petitioner, alleging that he and his brother had filed the paper. But only the managing director, while the defendant, who was a shareholder in the company, was in fact running the company because the de facto managing director and the applicant was not affiliated with the affairs of the company, he said that the shareholder diverted the funds. And showed the company mismanagement, the company was in a loss and was unable to pay. His loan and he had not declared profit for the last nine years, none of the lenders and shareholders had supported the petitioner's summit petition, therefore, it was difficult for the applicant's wishes. It was difficult to give preference to the shareholders. As opposed to the remaining shareholders, the majority is around 69%
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
