Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD FAYAZ-UD-DIN


Section 8 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Plaintiff's suit for possession on the basis of Permanent Transfer Deed (PTD) alleges that such PTD was obtained by the plaintiff through fraud and misrepresentation. What is it. And the suit was not available for allotment to be attached to the land school; the trial court rejected it by the appellate court, but the review was ruled out by the High Court. Acknowledged the allotment of land and responded to the fraud case. Negatively neither inquiries were made before any of the PTD forums nor any action was taken to cancel it, nor was there any suit land vesting in the Settlement Department in view of MLR 264. No case was presented, nor was there any reason to prove any evidence.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sibi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.