FATEH MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM MUSTAFA
Section 42 Land Reforms Regulations, 1972 (MLR 115), paragraph 24 (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan, (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for declaration that the plaintiff has claimed that the execution of the alleged sale The work was fake, fake and illegal, as it is a breach by the trial court of Para 24 (4) of the Land Reform Regulations 1972, which was decided by the appellate court and the High Court, which established the plaintiff. Raised by the fact that its holding is less than stagnant, it can only be distinguished by such terms. For the person who fulfilled the required qualifications, the High Court did not find favor in possessing any substance, in fact there was no defect in reading the false news of the three courts simultaneously or reading the evidence on one question. Leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Rajana lawyer