MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the definition of evidence of section 161 was not recovered from the possession of the accused, but at the time of the arrest of the accused, the two constables raised him from the ground, which was not examined. Was gone As the prosecution's witnesses in the case, no one saw the accused throwing the money to the ground, nor did he have the money exchanged by the complainant, nor the accused and the complainant at the relevant time. Negotiations were not even heard. In the presence of documentary evidence immediately available at the time of the raid, the complainant's statement cannot be taken as a fact of the good news that he came to pay Rs 105 as the amount of dues against his father. The amount involved was that the ground suspect was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Shangla lawyer