In cases 13 and 5, the trial court for the acquittal of the accused and the plaintiff's plaintiff's plaintiff's counsel for the possession of the cases were ruled that the order was passed by the appellate court that the plaintiff's argument It was recorded by the appellate court recording these findings. In the case of the plaintiff in connection with the trial, the evidence was presented incorrectly, while investigating it was confirmed that the plaintiff had complied with the terms of the petition and the evidence indicated, the record certified. Copy was referenced These rights, which the defendant himself submitted, a certified copy of this document, it was noted, were obtained by the plaintiff on 2 7 1999, and the appellate court used the said document solely for the purpose. What was Knowledge was made by the plaintiff of the variation in the questions and it was found out that the plaintiff had made a false claim in his claim to know of the above changes. Ions on 21 8 1999 and the subsequent death of the deceased in filing the document with the date, could not be allowed to argue that the document is inadmissible and has no substantive value. The Court of Appeal was late found because of. Review based on law and evidence was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
