Section 22A & 22B Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Registration in the Court of Justice, jurisdiction over the confiscation of property, Petitioner filed section 22A & 22BCPC for registration of FIR The application was moved under, but has been removed. The petitioner's case for justice was that the defendant was his tenant and, upon demanding rent, he entered his house and tortured his family, damaging domestic articles and committing theft. That the defendants obtained interim injunction by presenting fake and fraudulent proprietorships, and that the Justice of Peace did not commit the negligence by refusing to direct the FIR against the respondents. No specific incident of crime, which was caused by the petitioner's torture, misconduct or theft, nor did he mention the specific date or time of the incident in his application for FIR registration. What the respondents have said is that the activities have raised reasonable doubt about its accuracy and the respondents are of the view that fake and fake The injunction on the basis of Ziff Frank ownership showed that the alleged offense had been committed in connection with the proceedings of the court, so the order for issuance of instructions for filing a case could have been approved under the court section 195 (1). c) Part of the dispute over the possession of property is between the I and the Justice of the Peace has correctly found that the petition under Sections 22A and 22B, CCPC, is likely to Pressure on the respondents that the applicant's position is that the Justice of Peace Act
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
