LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
A. VIII, R10 Specific Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Article 44 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Failure to Insert Written Statement, Attacking Defendants' Defendants Contingent Trial Trial I, provided the defendant with six opportunities to write a written statement, but the defendants failed to stop defendant's defense from failing the same trial court, saying that the trial court's order by the appellate court affirmed. Retained, though, has normally approved five postponements for filing a written statement. But, even in the final adjournment order, the trial court did not expressly state that it was the last opportunity to file a written statement or that no other opportunity would be given to the trial court, in the circumstances, to prevent defendant's defense. There was an error in the law. Equivalent to the notion by the trial court and the imposition of a penal clause in violation of the law enacted by the superior courts. Because the present decisions of the courts were not in accordance with the law, the High Court had obliged the plaintiff to pay heavy expenses and the defendants were directed to file a written statement within the stipulated period. Law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
