TARIQ AHMED ALIAS TAHRI versus THE STATE
Accused in his statement under Section 230 ((c) and ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Section 342), the CCP did not deny the commission on the crime and made the request. That he was intoxicated with alcohol, and as he did not know what he was doing, the trial court sentenced the accused under Sections 302 (c) and 201, pp. The affidavit was filed by the High Court, which injured around 14 and the accused confirmed the incident.The justification of the prosecution's version fell to the ground with consideration and he did not appeal the reasoning and the case was decided The frequency of intervention, it was completely impossible to guarantee that the applicant had also failed to indicate the legal, had dismissed the application for leave to appeal by the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kumbh lawyer
