Find a Lawyer

KHALID KHAN KHATAK, A.S.P., SADAR, RAWALPINDI versus SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI CORRUPTION, PUNJAB

Section 561A Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), Section 6 (5) Convention (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) against the police. Charges of litigation under Section 161, PPC and Section 5 (2), Special Judge Anti-Corruption of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, after recording preliminary evidence, concluded that the applicants were prosecuted. There were already adequate opportunities for a hearing to be heard and a letter to the competent authority on the same day, on the same day, on 6 April 1999, for approval for legal proceedings against the applicants. Approval was received by the Office Commissioner and on 9th 1999 the trial court was informed that the competent authority had refused to approve the legal proceedings against the officers. The trial court concluded that if the 22 days of the remaining July month and 31 days of August 1999 were to be calculated, the lack of sanction should have been accepted. Until 79 1999, but as it was sent on 9 1999, it had shown that it was approved after 62 days and it would be presumed that under litigation under litigation. The action was taken under Section 6 (5) of Pakistan. Under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958, the question is whether the question of approval or denial must be resolved within sixty days, the letter for approval may have been written two weeks ago, but the first day when calculated Received at the office of. The authority and the last day will be counted when the approval was sent by the virtual authority and not when the letter of approval or denial was disclosed by the court. top advocates from Peshawar lawyer