Article 199 Establishment of the Office of the Delegate Ombudsman [Order of 1983, Order I], Article 32 Constitution Petitioner's mother was a policy holder with the insurance corporation and after her death the insurance claim was filed by the applicant. , Was denied by the corporation on the basis that the value charged by the policy holder for non-payment of late fees, with the late payment of the collection premium, required by the Federal Ombudsman Claim Case. Was decided in favor of the applicant, by the Federal Ombudsman Corporation, in this order before the President of Pakistan. He was challenged by the constitutional petition, dismissing the order of the former applicant, challenging the unclean order on the basis that the claim was wrongly rejected and the applicant's case was covered. ? Under the corporation's insurance policy
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
