MUHAMMAD HAROON versus THE STATE
Sections 420, 468, 471 and 489 (b) (b) of the evidence were not available to the trial court for material that could indicate that the molestation of the prize bonds was solely based on the illegality of the prize bonds. Occupied, there was hardly any ground for it. In the absence of evidence that the convicted trial court could attach to the accused, the accused charged by the trial court was also not justified in convicting and convicting the accused because to show that There was nothing in the record that sought permission to prosecute. In the unrecognizable offense, the accused prosecution failed to exclude the burden of proving the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and the evidence was not sufficient to convict the accused and the trial court dismissed the sentence against the accused. And the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer
