MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus IBRAR
S: 6, 7 and 8 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), objection to the enactment of section 302/324/148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, to examine, to bring any offense within the scope of the Act It is important to point out that the item of this Act should be a crime and should depend on the provisions of the Act, &, and by, even though the previous enmity was expressed, but nevertheless It may be particularly noted that he has gone beyond that. The incident, which took place in the mosque, was a public place, especially during the Friday prayers, where a large number of people usually gathered to pray, and such incidents occurred under the provisions of Rule 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Were enough to attract Safdar Hussain Malik, Judge, ATA Court II, Rawalpindi and 3 others PLD 2004 reversed 726]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Havelian lawyer