Find a Lawyer

DR. GHULAM MURTAZA versus THE STATE

The petitioner for the cancellation of Section 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 224 Order, requested the termination of an order passed by the Sessions Judge, under which he was allegedly subject to the court's legal arrest against him. Was directed to file a lawsuit because of a fugitive. In the Sessions Judge case under 545, the PPC filed a case against the accused, before the accused approached the session judge for anticipatory bail, which ordered the notice, but the accused had no interim bail. The case was not approved and the matter was postponed several times, and advance bail pleas were settled before the sessions judge accused appeared on the first call, but on the second call they were prevented from appearing before the session judge. Because of the security of the police in the courtroom of the session judge and they arrested him as an additional by the police. Although the Sessions Judge had adjourned the matter several times but did not admit the accused on interim bail, the Sessions Judge was informed by his relatives through a caution / request that the Sessions Judge be informed that The accused are being barred from appearing in the court as the police had guarded the entire courtroom, while the sessions judge dismissed the accused for illegal proceedings and ordered registration of the case. An attempt was made to suspend the order under Section 24 Section PP, PPC against them, initially, if the notice was issued on bail prior to the arrest request, under normal circumstances, the accused would be granted interim bail. Should be extended, several adjournments approved by Additional Sessions Judge, interim advocate from Phalia lawyer