MUHAMMAD YASIN versus S.S.P. AND OTHERS
Section 420/466/468/471/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 154 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and FIR of the 1991 Constitution Petitioner (one of the accused) A government employee sought to overturn the FIR on the basis that only the Anti-Corruption Establishment is capable of filing a criminal case against him and investigating the same. According to the police station in charge of the constitutional application dismissed, the charge was authorized under section 154 CCPC, so as to file an FIR. Receiving a notification to the Cognizant of Crimes Investigation under Section 202020, PPC, was at least such an admissible offense if, for the sake of argument, it was considered that such an FIR was merely an anti-corruption establishment. The source may be filed, yet it was protected by the law declared by the state in this case. v. Bashir and other PLD 1997 SC 408 An improper order can not be discounted. The Supreme Court dismisses the petition and denies leave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Dir lawyer