SYED IMAM SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.
Sections 13 and 27 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and the 1993 High Court Service issues fresh appointments in terms of the terms and conditions of service of the affected person and the deviations from the exercise of the equality of fixed qualifications with the terms of service. The complaint was that instead of the initial recruits / direct appointments, the vacancies for the superintendents should have been filled, which had become customary which could not be neglected, instead of the initial recruitment / direct appointments the Supreme Court. Appointments were made by the applicants. His constitutional petition, which was rejected by the High Court, could have raised the question of terms and conditions after the appointments, and apart from giving rise to any reason, no rules and regulations were violated. That was exactly what they were created for.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Hala lawyer