Find a Lawyer

ZAHID MUNIR versus MALIK MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section 491 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Habitat Corporation, submitted before the High Court, which was sentenced by the Federal Shariat Court, remained on bail during the appeal hearing, before the Federal Law. The court was charged with moving the petition for leave to appeal. Against the Federal Shariat Court's decision in the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court refused to entertain the said plea because the accused first surrendered to the police authorities, the Supreme Court, however, passed an order to entertain the petition. ? He was not arrested in pursuance of the Federal Shariat Court verdict, while relaxing the rules regarding the confirmation of a lawyer's conviction by the jail authorities of that time, and the order further observed that the accused applied for bail. Can After entertaining the aforementioned application for leave to appeal, the petition for leave to appeal by the accused was entertained, registered and was not yet settled before the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court as well as the suspension of sentence. Or, with a request for a grant of bail, the police arrested the accused in compliance with the Federal Shariat Court verdict against which the defendants moved a Habeas Corpus application under Section 491, Cr. The PCA alleges before the High Court that the arrest and detention of the jail was illegal, given the Supreme Court's order for deportation by the jail authorities, with the rules confirming the interim verdict, and the illegal high court by the accused. Hub Corps application dismissed. Accuracy The High Court upheld an accurate view of Supreme Court law suspension online advocate from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer