MUMTAZ AHMED versus THE STATE
Further investigation against the accused, according to Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109, was alleged that he was holding the victim's legs while his co-accused was wearing clothes. Was put around a piece of paper. In his report under Section 173 by the Inspector / Section HO of the Neck, the CCP observed that the statements of the investigator of the complainant and his eyewitness did not help, thus the benefit of the doubt even to the accused. Maybe even the co-accused was admitted at the bailout stage. The role of the accused and the accompanying accused for the bail was the same, although not so much as the suspect's further investigation into the crime, in which case, he was entitled to a discount on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Bhalwal lawyer
