Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD CHAUDHRY versus BISCO KNITWEAR (PVT.) LIMITED

Sections 47, 104 and AXXI, Rr 22, 23 (2), 46 Issuance of Notice of Appeal for Compliance with the Order Compliance Notice The executor of the property belonging to the decedent was the owner of a company and Was a shareholder of another company against which, upon the request of the decree holder, the trial court was granted, notice was issued to the complainant under O XXI, R 22, CPC, and on behalf of his company An objection was filed that neither the objector nor his company was a party to the matter. And no decree was issued against them, so, under OXXI, R 22, CPC, the notice could not be issued to them, the court deleted the name of the company owned by the complainant but the property of the objector. O XXI, attached under R. 46, on the accuracy of the CPC, the court upheld the decree holder's request under OXXI, R 46, CPC whereby the objection petition was granted to the extent owned by the objector's company and its name Ny was removed from the order execution proceedings and this order was approved by the Executive Court at the request of the decree holder under O XXI, R 46, CPC and pursuant to section 47, CPC Was not, therefore, a decree passed against the shareholders of the company, there was no basis for its implementation in the application. The enforcement court correctly approved the order, under which the name of the objector-owned company was deleted. property advocates from Multan lawyer