RANGBAZ versus THE STATE
The accused was not produced in Shariah court after the release of Section 498 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Fines (Enforcement Hood) Act, 1985, before the 10/16 pre-arrest bail trial court bail. Had to The bail court, however, canceled the bail of the accused related to the merit, after which the accused did not surrender to the police, but he applied for bail before the arrest before the Supreme Court, which was granted till then. The appeal was not granted until the appeal was dismissed. Under the procedure, the accused filed his appeal without surrendering to the police and his explanation for not working was not accepted by the record, the appeal filed by the accused, therefore, was not authorized. The accused was not entitled to the conduct of the act. Any interim pre-arrest bail that was canceled and accordingly his appeal was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer
