Find a Lawyer

W. T. A. NO. 170/LB OF 1998, DECIDED ON 8TH OCTOBER, 1998. versus W. T. A. NO. 170/LB OF 1998, DECIDED ON 8TH OCTOBER, 1998.

Section 16 Assessment No value of the plot obtained by the Government was declared by the Assessment Officer by the First Appellate Authority under the action of Section 35 of the Property Tax Act by the Government. Had to pay. , 1963, and when the payment of compensation by the government was determined by the first appellate authority, the cost of the plot was still in favor of revenue collection. The Assessee was not much owner of the property in question and was entitled to receive compensation. Can be appreciated. Cannot be more than that which is determined by the Land Acquisition Collector. The deposit amount was not received in the office of the Sub-Collector. The amount determined by the Collector is fixed till the higher value of the property in question. It should indicate what is being done through the relevant forums. This amount would be recoverable instead of showing the ownership of the said plot, which was then invalidated by another appellate authority from the first appellate authority in estimating the value of the land, the Appellate Tribunal said. 'S appeal was denied. immigration advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer