SYED KHALIL-UR-REHMAN CHISHTI versus ABDUL HAMID KHAN
Section 5 Laws on the Evidence (10 of 1984), Art, 129 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) 79 Kanal Land Exchange with 16 Kanal, Former Umpire alleges that such exchange was for sale. Is to blame Such a transaction is to be exchanged and not sold; the Appellate Court has affirmed it and it has been affirmed by the High Court that the evidence of the affirmation by the offer in support of such application is vague and sketchy. The integrity of a guardianship cannot be regarded as a mere doubt, nor can it be regarded as a mere sale of speculation. That Kan Canal land could not be exchanged with 16 canal land. In the absence of any justification, the existing Convergent Findings cannot be interrupted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Parachinar lawyer
