Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 5077/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 10TH MAY, 2001. versus I.T.A. NO. 5077/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 10TH MAY, 2001.

Sections 59 (1) and 55 CBR Circular No. 21, 2000, Dated 119, 2000, Para 6 (a) (Self Assessment Scheme) CBR Circular No. 26, 2000 Date 140000 Selection by self-diagnosis computer belt The consensus that the High Court then declared such an election invalid and challenging the selection of a case for a total audit through parametric selection by computer belting is appropriate after the completion of the assessment on a unanimous basis. By means of computer belting the case was selected without legal authority, the law passed by the diagnostic officer was without any jurisdiction and In the eyes of the law it was offensive. The ECC did not approve the officer of any illegal assessment, the evaluation officer generally had no jurisdiction to prosecute the issue. Without the law and the legal jurisdiction under which it was sent, the law was contrary to law. Appellate Tribunal top advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer