Find a Lawyer

NAEEM AKRAM KHAN versus MUMTAZ AHMED

Section 497 (5) Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, cancellation of pistol recovery as well as the procedure for filing a report in a police post after the incident was hacked. , It is clearly shown that he was not a common culprit but was a dangerous offender in the sense of the Fourth Section of Section 497, after being acquitted of the CCP accused he was also associated with the commission of the crime which Along with this he was accused of Sharia. The court did not deny the trial court's conclusion that the accused was a dangerous offender within the meaning of section 497, CCPC questioning whether the accused was a harsh, frustrated or dangerous offender, The circumstances of the case, the contents on the record, the manner in which the offense was committed and the purpose of committing the crime, were to identify the cases related to the trial. The suspect was a hat-fi, based on a precise definition of a dangerous criminal law that allowed the bail bail to be granted by the Shariah Court. immigration advocates email from Abbaspur lawyer