WAH CEMENT COMPANY EMPLOYEES' MANAGEMENT GROUP, WAH THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED AND ANOTHER versus STATE CEMENT CORPOPRATION OF PAKISTAN, (PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN) AND 3 OTHERS
The Sections 8, 14, 20, 30 and 41 awards, together with the failure to present reasonable grounds, were referred to the arbitrator for a decision in the terms of the arbitration agreement and a clause in the sale agreement stated in clear terms. It was said that machinery or land, buildings and old plant structures would not be subject to sale and the area of the old plant would be surrounded by a boundary wall. Petitioner, including the old plant, sought to separate the award on the basis that the award was made in contravention of the sale agreement between the parties and there was no reason to support the award.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Mandra lawyer
