Find a Lawyer

UMAR ALI versus THE STATE

Sections 514 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/429/148/149 for the confiscation of the accused for whom the applicant failed to appear in the trial court on bail, the applicants / bailiffs. The notice of shock was presented to the court in response to the notice that the trial court was unable to present the accused before the court, considering their financial status, reducing the amount of bail bail to less than one lakh. Lakhs of rupees and the bailiffs are directed to pay the said bail amount till the due date. Were they to fulfill their obligation under the bond offered, after accepting the obligation to pay the bail, it would not say in their mouth that they did not pay due to their financial condition. Can do. Bail bonds executed by them and that they stand on the bail of the accused, who have done no financial gain, after being charged with a full bail bond where the accused had jumped bail, the whole bail. The amount can be confiscated, as the bail is reduced by the amount of the bail bail already held by the trial court, which has taken a softer view, so the bail may be guaranteed on the bail. To further reduce the amount of bail bonds, the trial court's controversial order of accuracy, proper and legal, did not demand the intervention of the High Court in its revised jurisdiction. advocate for immigration from Sibi lawyer