Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus MST. FATIMA SAEED

Sections 15, 19 and 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Defaults on the payment of rent by the tenant and the personal necessity of making the eviction proceedings personally reopening the lease by the tenant The application for and the proprietor's lawyer filed his affidavit. According to the tenant, the tenant had failed to inspect the landlord's lawyer and no reasonable opportunity was provided for the tenant's eviction. An order was ordered on both the basis of the payment of rent and the personal need of the landlord, as well as a request by the rent controller and the appellate court to reopen the tenant's direction and allow the landlord's lawyer to pass. Was approved by the rent controller. At that time, the same was filed some time ago, although no such time was provided under any of the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1908 or any other law for the time being, to close the tenant's sides and The order to revoke a further landlord's lawyer and refuse to allow the tenant to examine the said witness was not justified because the appropriate opportunity was not provided. The tenant used the controller to cross-examine the landlord's lawyer by cross-examining his case and then after failing to file his evidence in the rejection controller, he failed to sue There were no legs because there was no time limit to file. Petitioners' right to re-open the right of the tenants tax advocates from North Wazirstan lawyer