Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 3353/LB TO 3355/LB OF 1999, DECIDED ON 30TH MAY, 2003. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 3353/LB TO 3355/LB OF 1999, DECIDED ON 30TH MAY, 2003.

An inspection of the Additional Commissioner inspecting the Additional Commissioner's inspection limits to review the order of the section 66A deputy commissioner found that the first showcase under section 66A was restricted to the signing of section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The notice will be from the date of issue. Assessment under section 62 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, Taxation Ordinance, was framed in section 24A 1995, the limitation to seek the provisions of Section 66A of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, passed under Section 66A. Will be calculated from the date specified. The Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which was assessed on 12-12 1999, was passed by the Inspecting Additional Commissioner after a gap of four years, three months and 18 days, while it should be made within four years from the date of passing the order. Was. Under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which was dated 24th 1999, not on 12 5 1999, the Additional Commissioner under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was badly affected by the good cheeses. The Inspector Additional Commissioner, having committed no fault on his part, infused the asset into the chain of litigation, the order approved under section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance was not 1979. The legal authority and the appellate tribunal declared it to have no legal effect female advocates from Lalamusa lawyer