ABDUR REHMAN SHAUKAT versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD AKRAM JAVED, DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), KASUR
Articles 204, 2A, 5 (2), 189, 190 and 201 were obtained without contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), contempt of court 3/4 of the petitioner's contempt of court land acquisition act, 1894. Without their consent and without paying any money, only then the Chief Minister and his relations were asked to save / protect the land that the respondents did not respond to in 1996 despite the directives of the High Court and the Supreme Court. Source used. Respondent for granting alternative land to the applicant, he had not done so till the respondents did not implement the decisions of the High Court and the Supreme Court on each other without any justification. Correspondence between the respondents. Was clearly in contempt of. The High Court as well as the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kharian lawyer
