Rules 392/397/34 Definition of Evidence Defendant was not caught on the spot where the cash was snatched The recovery of cash from the accused did not prove to be the accused, according to the complainant himself, was not affected by his face at the time of the incident. ? It is available on the record to show that the accused was among the offenders who looted the complainant, under the previous judgment in which the co-accused was sentenced and sentenced on his present trial. There was no prejudice effect as there was no party charge against the accused in this case. Was not proved and accordingly he was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
