Find a Lawyer

MST. NUSRAT versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.

Sections 8 and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 34 (2), 151, 152, 153 and O.X.C., R62 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 Implementation of the Order of Declaration Further Interest Jurisdiction The interest in the decree itself was not given by correcting the order for award of award. Scope was approved on 14 7 1981. Objection to the execution of the property attached by the appellant bank on payment of deferred property 30 Exec was recorded in 1991 under which the application was filed on 27 1 1993 Section 152/153/151, CPC, along with the expected amendment execution request Seeking relief in the future given the benefit of the reform, the court modified the order of 16 199 since 1994 and executed the fresh horror of such relief dismissed the application in the absence of implementing it. Appeal filed by the appellant was reviewed on order dated 169 199, without notice to the appellants, who were entitled to a hearing before the same appellants were approved. Appeal was filed after knowing of the approval of such order, which was not time bound. Such order was without jurisdiction because after the approval of the order, the banking court became a fact office. And could not entertain the petition under Section 152/153, CPC. The filing was also banned after 11/2 years of the approval of the decree, while it did not consciously receive any relief in interest when the original decree was passed, although the provisions of section 152/153, CPC The same request was made under, not the assistance sought by the bank jobs for fresh advocates from Gujranwala lawyer