AHMED DIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Article 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1991 Islamabad Oasis Scheme Islamabad Allotment of land to the affected applicants Although no allotment of any part of the disputed land under any scheme was filed by the Constitution, Which was rejected by the High Court dispute. The applicants said that they were in possession of the land, which they were entitled to retain because the government is legally obligated to provide them with asylum, as well as the law to counter the claim of the Allies under the Islamabad Ossities Scheme. I can't be available anywhere. Applicants for any right to uphold the constitutional petition should freely approach the government to provide them with shelter and not challenge the allotment of legality in favor of the respondents. Under a scheme designed for the victims of Islamabad, the order has been canceled that it is not vulnerable to any kind of weakness. Leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer