ZULFIQAR ALI MUMTAZ versus UNITED BANK LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS
Section 6 and 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Rules, 1980, R 8 Ex parte decree, set aside Putting aside the application for the order was filed after eight years under which the application for contempt of court proceedings was delayed. Thus, they were unaware of his decision or order passed by the Special Judge dismissing both petitions. The process for servicing the defendants by all methods, including the publication of the banking companies 'Daily Roll 8 (Recovery of Loans) Rules, 1980, provided that the services in any way were for the purposes of the defendants' ordinance service. Shall be deemed appropriate and correct. This was affected by the publication in the newspapers, therefore, they cannot claim that the defendants were not served or neither appeared nor filed after their proper service. , The Special Judge correctly approved the previous party's decree against him, the request for a rejection of the order was banned at all times, and for delayed condolences, no suitable place was shown. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
