Find a Lawyer

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL versus HABIB BANK LTD. AND 7 OTHERS

Sections 6 (8) and 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXI, R 62 Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894), Sections 4, 11 and 16 claim that the sale was made by the decree holder (decree holder). The Appellant Local Development Authority, pursuant to the date of sale 29 1990 5 1990 with the bank, sued the mortgagee for the suit land mortgage judgment claiming to acquire such land in 1970 under the Land Acquisition Act 1894. An objection petition was filed, the banking tribunal dismissed the objection request. According to the validation record, the notification for the acquisition of such land was issued on 16 2 1968, and its award was issued and the government occupied it in 1970, thus, it acquired the land. Was occupied and has been in control of the government since then. The occupation authority for excluding the relevant entry in the Revenue Record will not exempt the Authority from its ownership, the Objection Certificate, which is stated in the 4 1990 1990 statement issued by the Land Acquisition Collector. Accordingly, such land was not obtained, it was of no avail, as it had no authority in law to issue any such certificate, the High Court accepted the appeal, appointed the refusal order and such The land was removed from the bank's telecast by the bank. famous high court advocate from Layyah lawyer