MUHAMMAD ASGHAR NADEEM versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of payment of Rs. 2,600 to the accused before the raid and recovery of the defaulted amount of Rs. 1,400. The money was set completely on record by the prosecution witnesses during the raid, who had no defamation or any ill motions, in which case the defendant's lying in any case related to the defendant's explanation. The trust was not encouraged, it is alleged that it was already dealt with softly by the affected courts. There was no illegal or legal weakness in the decision. The leave to appeal was denied to the accused in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Bannu lawyer
