Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN MANGAT versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR


Section 2302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), appealed against the incident of imprisonment on the first night of the lunar month at 2 o'clock in the vicinity of the complainant's residence near Nala. The victim was taken out in the same condition in which the eye witnesses could not present any plausible reason for being present at the time of the night record at which the eyewitnesses could identify the accused. The eyewitnesses were merely witnesses of the occasion, and their stated account did not affect trust. The prosecution failed to encourage theft because the human blood was not stained because medical evidence was not available to the account. The High Court had given reasons for acquittal of the accused but in these circumstances the appeal of the complainant was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Lahore lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.