Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN MANGAT versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR


Section 2302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), appealed against the incident of imprisonment on the first night of the lunar month at 2 o'clock in the vicinity of the complainant's residence near Nala. The victim was taken out in the same condition in which the eye witnesses could not present any plausible reason for being present at the time of the night record at which the eyewitnesses could identify the accused. The eyewitnesses were merely witnesses of the occasion, and their stated account did not affect trust. The prosecution failed to encourage theft because the human blood was not stained because medical evidence was not available to the account. The High Court had given reasons for acquittal of the accused but in these circumstances the appeal of the complainant was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Ghazi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.