Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 2 30b (b) Defining the evidence The complainant, who was the brother of the deceased, was a lawyer by profession on the day he came, had a working day, and the complainant had to establish the reason for his presence with his late brother. I was completely unsuccessful. He was usually expected to be engaged in his professional practice that day when dealing with the relevant time because he was present as a lawyer at that time because He could not establish his presence at the time of his presence. The witness was also an eyewitness who, at the relevant time, had completely failed to provide any explanation for the presence of the road outside the deceased's factory, the location of the incident was surrounded by various shops, but the prosecution was acquitted. Someone from the pass failed to produce an independent witness. The prosecution's witnesses failed to obtain any independent support from any independent source top civil advocates from Ambela lawyer