PROVINCE OF SINDH versus MUHAMMAD ISSA
R19 Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979), Section 40 and Schedule II, Part II of Punjab Agricultural Products Market Act (V 1939) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Constitution / Recovery of Ningani Fees in Constitutional Application Respect for agricultural production subject to the receipt of market fees under the Punjab Agricultural Production Market Act, 1939 in the petition. The High Court has said that the authority cannot charge such fees. Date 10 8 1966 was first challenged in the case and then revised before the High Court, which could not be challenged again before the High Court through a constitutional petition. That the High Court did not consider R 19 (1) of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 1964, which was formulated under Schedule II of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance 1979, Part II of the respondent was that the High Court had issued notification no. The effects of SO II were not examined. (34) / 91, dated 26 7 1991, in this case, the Supreme Court granted an appeal for scrutiny of such petitions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Burewala lawyer