Find a Lawyer

M. AS. (RECT.) NOS.226/KB TO 228/KB OF 2003 IN I.T.AS. NOS.511/KB TO 513/KB OF 2002 versus M. AS. (RECT.) NOS.226/KB TO 228/KB OF 2003 IN I.T.AS. NOS.511/KB TO 513/KB OF 2002

Sections 135 (4) (c), 135 (5), 23 (1) and 66 of an Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Section 221 (1) of the appellate tribunal inspecting error correction Setting aside the order of Through appellate tribunal assessment, the Additional Commissioner argued that the order was silent on the direction of the Assessing Officer in view of Sections (3) and (4) of section 135 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. ? If the appellate tribunal, while dealing with an appeal, is satisfied that the assessment subject to the appeal should be set aside, it will set aside the assessment, directing the Assessing Officer to make such an assessment and The matter should be ordered to be kept separate. The Inspector Additional Commissioner's recent decision will be postponed because of its appearance as unlawful, and this would be equivalent to exercising jurisdiction over the powers conferred on subsection (5) of section 135 of the Income Tax Order. The provision of law read with section 134 of the Income Tax stated that under the law read with Section 134 of the Income Tax, under section 135 (4) (a), (b) and (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Imagination options had nothing to do with it. The ordinance will be able to deal with the situation by remanding the appellate tribunal to the Additional Commissioner, 1979, as the provisions of section 135 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 were returned to a substantial, clear, unambiguous issue. Send to the Inspector Additional Commissioner where the order varied by appellate tribunal online advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer