Sections 39, 46 and 52 re-count the election petition, praying for the applicant that the presiding officer forbade his polling agents from participating in the election process, and that the valedictorian petitioner neither counted among his polling agents. No one has been investigated for any such allegation, nor was the presiding officer against whom. It was alleged that the applicant did not disclose in the election petition or in the evidence of his polling agents, who were allegedly denied entry to the polling stations or participating in the names of the presiding officers, But has committed such an illegal act. Less than 600, of which the applicant received 82 votes, while the returning candidates received 265 votes, the difference of votes received by the returning candidate was more than 1300, therefore, if the re-counting order If given, there will be no material change.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
