SYED ABDUL LATIF SHAH versus ALI MUHAMMAD KHAN
Conducting Sections 14, 52, 78, 82 and 99 General Elections Order [Chief Executive Order No. 7 of 2002], Article 8A Election Petition challenged the selection of the returning candidate that the returning candidate on that day Submitting nomination papers to was not a graduate. Returning officer's misconception in the bachelor's degree and that by filing a false declaration in relation to his / her educational qualification, and by filing a false affidavit and false certificate / documents in connection with his / her educational qualification. Was compiled by. The record fully proved that the retired candidate was a graduate at the time of filing the nomination, and there was nothing on record to deny that the allegations of illegal or corrupt were to be proved in a criminal case. Was. The returning candidate must prove the standard with which it was necessary to prove the charge in a curry, but he failed to do so if any suspicion arises from the material on record. So, the benefit of which the returning candidate must go, filing the election petition against the candidate filed by the applicant / petitioners without qualification, was excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kotmomin lawyer